Home AdExchanger Talks Not All Automated Ad Products Are Alike

Not All Automated Ad Products Are Alike

SHARE:
Nii Ahene, chief strategy officer, Tinuiti

Google’s Performance Max and Meta’s Advantage+ often get tossed into the same bucket.

But there are several important differences between these machine-learning-powered ad-buying tools, says Nii Ahene, chief strategy officer at performance marketing agency Tinuiti, speaking on this episode of AdExchanger Talks. (It’s our final show of 2023, if you can believe it!)

One key difference is how marketers feel about the tools.

When Apple announced its AppTrackingTransparency (ATT) framework in 2020, it was clear that Facebook (this is back when Facebook was still called Facebook) had to rebuild large parts of its advertising platform to deal with signal loss.

ATT essentially severed Facebook’s ability to understand what was happening beyond its own walls. And the brands that relied on it for targeting and campaign measurement were rooting for a fix.

“That was a broken system,” Ahene says. “Facebook needed to figure something else out, and Advantage+ has been a partial savior for clients … and wholly embraced by our clients.”

The challenge with Google’s Performance Max, he says, is that it aggregates multiple types of inventory within one auction, which makes it useful for smaller, less sophisticated advertisers, but aggravating for big brands that want more transparency.

It’s also very challenging to get access via Performance Max to certain desirable inventory types, like YouTube Shorts, outside of alpha or beta programs, Ahene says. (Not to mention that it can also be very challenging to avoid access to certain undesirable inventory types through PMax, as was evidenced by the recent report from Adalytics about Google’s Search Partner Network.)

“It’s causing a lot of consternation and frustration for larger advertisers,” Ahene says. “On Facebook, you still have that level of control … but that’s not the case with the Google properties, and that’s definitely been a point of friction for a lot of our clients.”

Also in this episode: The shiny object that is retail media (and will we ever get retail media network standards?), creative as a performance lever, what will happen to CPMs once third-party cookies are truly no longer available and Ahene’s personal mission to visit every NBA arena in the US.

Must Read

Liquid I.V. Sponsors A Formula 1 Race As DTC Brands Compete For Sports Fans

Digital-native brands are racing to break free of their social media roots to reach a broader base of US customers. For many brands, this means betting big on sports.

Comic: Shopper Marketing Data

Criteo Splits Out Retail Media Revenue For The First Time

Criteo split out its retail media segment revenue for the first time during its earnings report on Thursday.

Comic: Welcome Aboard

Google’s Ad Network Biz Dips, But Search Brings Home The Bacon

By next year, Google will have three separate business lines – Search, YouTube and Cloud – with an annual run rate to generate at least $100 billion, CEO Sundar Pichai told investors.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters
Comic: The Last Third-Party Cookie

Cookie-Related Quips To Get You Through Google’s THIRD Third-Party Cookie Delay

If you’re looking for a think piece about what Google’s most recent third-party cookie deprecation delay means for the online ad industry – this isn’t it. 😅

Comic: InstaTikSnapTokTube

The IAB Predicts Social Video Will Overtake CTV This Year

The IAB projects digital video ad spend will rise to $63 billion in 2024, representing a 16% increase from last year. Of the three video ad categories the report breaks out (social and online video and CTV), the clear winner is social video.

Pictograph of graph, mug of beer

Inside AB InBev’s Strategy For Tapping Into First-Party Data

Pour one out for third-party data. These days, AB InBev’s digital marketing strategy is built squarely on first-party data.