Home Online Advertising The Programmatic Prognosticator Who Sees The Tide Turning From Walled Gardens To The Open Web

The Programmatic Prognosticator Who Sees The Tide Turning From Walled Gardens To The Open Web

SHARE:

Laura Martin, a media and tech analyst at investment bank Needham & Company, opened her presentation at AdExchanger’s Programmatic I/O in Las Vegas this week by singing her own walk-on music.

“I came in like a wreccckkkkkiiiiinnnnggggg baaalllllllllll.”

The Miley Cyrus single was an apt choice, since Martin came in hot with some bold, contrarian predictions.

For example, Martin believes that the advertising revenue pendulum will swing back in favor of the open internet and the programmatic ecosystem, rather than towards the walled gardens that gobbled up so many ad dollars over the past decade.

Her optimism is partly due to the relative weakness of the open internet.

Huh?

Needham estimates that Alphabet, which owns Google and YouTube, of course, Meta, Amazon and Disney combined will grab around $650 billion of ad dollars in 2023.

By comparison, The Trade Desk earned just $1.2 billion in 2021, its first time clearing the billion-dollar mark in a single year. Criteo, which Martin doesn’t cover, generates low billions in revenue as well, and even the strongest other programmatic companies earn in the hundreds of millions in terms of annual revenue, which is peanuts by walled garden standards.

But “what that means is that a tiny 1% or 2% shift in budgets from the big platforms could double or even triple” the pie for open programmatic, Martin said.

And those shifts are happening. Meta in particular, she said “is losing and will lose” its current feud with Apple.

Subscribe

AdExchanger Daily

Get our editors’ roundup delivered to your inbox every weekday.

Last year, Facebook benchmarked its expected revenue headwinds from Apple’s iOS 14.5 privacy changes at $10 billion. Presumably, at least some of those ad dollars will go somewhere else. If just 10% of that loose sofa change found its way to open programmatic channels, it would represent a huge injection of spend to the category.

Apple’s privacy changes and other privacy-related upheavals, such as Google’s “threatened” third-party cookie phaseout, favor the open web, somewhat counterintuitively, because the return on ad spend calculations enabled by third-party site tracking accrued largely to platforms like Google, Facebook and, to a lesser degree, Snapchat, which all have ubiquitous tracking pixels.

Martin refers to impending demise of third-party cookies as a threat rather than a foregone conclusion, because she doesn’t think Chrome will follow through.

“Google will kick the can again on Chrome third-party deprecation,” she said.

And how’s this for a prediction? Martin expects Google will punt on cookie deprecation until an open industry solution such as the Unified ID 2.0 initiative reaches scale and Google can just join that program, rather than forging its own solution. Anything Google develops as a tracking and measurement alternative would inevitably face suits by regulators, she said, since any decision Google makes will disadvantage publishers, advertisers and/or competitive ad tech.

“Joining an outside industry solution” is the only way to avoid this fate, Martin said.

(Considering Google’s stance on email-based IDs, wonder what the under/over would be on that wager.)

Beyond walled garden woes, CTV advertising is another big potential driver of programmatic growth. The walled gardens dominate mobile advertising, but CTV is still a jump ball, Martin said.

Martin is far more optimistic about CTV and programmatic CTV compared with other advertising prognosticators. EMarketer, for instance, forecasts that CTV advertising will grow between 5% and 10% per year over the next three years. Martin said she thinks CTV growth will be 50% annually over the next three years.

“I’m more bullish on CTV and its tailwind for the open internet,” Martin said.

That’s an understatement.

But, hey, she said, in the world of Wall Street investment banking “you don’t have to be right, you just need to have an opinion.”

Must Read

Comic: Off-Platform Media

How RMNs Use MFA And Cheap Inventory To Game Attribution Rules

Retail media is built on its attribution quality, but real purchases can be gamed by programmatic metrics and create perverse incentives for RMNs to serve ads across low-quality inventory.

There’s A Lot Wrong With Google’s And Meta’s Non-Transparent ‘Refund’ Practices

Google and Meta are playing with fire. Their opaque refund practices have already exposed them to customer blowback – and could lead to class-action lawsuits by disgruntled advertisers.

Comic: The Great Online Privacy Battle

How US Intelligence Agencies Buy And Use Programmatic Data For Surveillance

Mike Yeagley, an independent contractor who has scouted and acquired commercial data and technology on behalf of intelligence agencies, is one of the earliest evangelists of using ad tech tracking information to identify and surveil government targets.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters

Comic: The MFA Cafe

Adalytics Report Torches Ad Tech For Touting MFA Prevention While Scarfing MFA Supply

Practically every ad tech vendor has put out a press release in recent months full of bluster about cutting out made for advertising sites – and yet supply sources remain oversaturated with garbage inventory.

Cloud-Based Collaboration Is Ad Tech’s Post-Cookie Lifeline – But Will It Last?

Cross-cloud data collaboration technology is the best bet for a post-cookie solution. But it’s vulnerable to similar privacy concerns.

Topsort Raises $20 Million To Seize The Post-Cookie Market Opportunity This Year

Topsort raised $20 million, with plans to seize the 2024 opportunity for post-cookie ad tech.