Home Data-Driven Thinking Apple Faces An Uphill Battle In Its Ad Tech Expansion

Apple Faces An Uphill Battle In Its Ad Tech Expansion

SHARE:
Ben Dutter, SVP of strategy at Power Digital

Data-Driven Thinking” is written by members of the media community and contains fresh ideas on the digital revolution in media.

Today’s column is written by Ben Dutter, SVP of strategy at Power Digital.

Apple’s advertising privacy policies (namely iOS 14) have rocked the digital advertising industry for the last year. But in the meantime, Apple’s ad business has seen plenty of growth.

Apple’s services business, including advertising, grew 24% year over year to $19.5B in Q1 of fiscal 2022. Bloomberg analysts estimate that advertising across the Apple ecosystem generates roughly $1B per quarter, and that slice is growing rapidly.

Some may view Apple’s recent moves as a means to protect their interests, but it is much more likely that the strategy is for Apple to build a moat around its own burgeoning ad business. 

Apple’s advertising venture

From opening roles like a technical DSP manager to showcasing new ad placements, Apple is actively looking to expand their presence in advertising. And why wouldn’t it? Digital advertising is a multi-hundred-billion-dollar industry, dominated by Apple’s long-time rival: Google.

A key reason that consumers prefer Apple is that it automatically opts them out of invasive targeting, attribution and advertising. In fact, only about one in four users opt back in. But once users are hit with ads across native apps in iOS, Apple might lose the very trust it has worked so hard to build. 

It’s one thing to have ads appear in a high-intent space – such as the current incarnation of Apple Search Ads. But it’s an entirely different ball game to have ads appear in content that Apple users perceive as “safe.” 

And while early placements suggest that Apple’s new inventory only exists around the App Store (their Today Tab and You Might Also Like section), this is only the beginning. There’s no reason to build a demand side platform (DSP) if you only intend to have three placements. 

The purpose of a DSP is to allow third parties to purchase advertising and targeting data programmatically. Apple knows that their arguably most valuable asset is a mountain of personal data – 1.8B active Apple devices’ worth, in fact. 

Subscribe

AdExchanger Daily

Get our editors’ roundup delivered to your inbox every weekday.

A hard road from hardware

One thing Apple needs to keep in mind is that it is primarily a hardware business. And not just any hardware business, but a great equalizer among the classes. Regardless of income, most consumers in the US prefer to buy an iPhone. 

Still, the company will inevitably face challenges as it looks to expand away from “luxury for everybody” hardware into software and ad tech. Google has decades of experience in digital marketing. While it didn’t innovate much in technology or placements, it has continued to gobble up market share, perfect the execution of its system and even delay its deprecation of cookies, a key component in its Google Ads ecosystem.

So what does all of this mean for the future of Apple ads? It has a long slog in the muck of litigation and regulation ahead of it, as well as a technological arms race.

I’m confident that Apple will sort these issues out and continue to expand – potentially creating its own “privacy-centric” search engine – and take Google head on. 

Competition is healthy, and as Apple transitions from hardware into more recurring revenue software and advertising, Google and others will step up their game.

There are plenty of combatants in this arena (data collectors vs. consumers, Apple vs. Google, privacy vs. tracking, hardware vs. software) and the winners are yet to be determined. As marketers, we must remain aware, alert and agile for the battles to come.

Follow Power Digital on LinkedIn and AdExchanger (@AdExchanger) on Twitter.

For more articles featuring Ben Dutter, click here.

Must Read

Comic: Off-Platform Media

How RMNs Use MFA And Cheap Inventory To Game Attribution Rules

Retail media is built on its attribution quality, but real purchases can be gamed by programmatic metrics and create perverse incentives for RMNs to serve ads across low-quality inventory.

There’s A Lot Wrong With Google’s And Meta’s Non-Transparent ‘Refund’ Practices

Google and Meta are playing with fire. Their opaque refund practices have already exposed them to customer blowback – and could lead to class-action lawsuits by disgruntled advertisers.

Comic: The Great Online Privacy Battle

How US Intelligence Agencies Buy And Use Programmatic Data For Surveillance

Mike Yeagley, an independent contractor who has scouted and acquired commercial data and technology on behalf of intelligence agencies, is one of the earliest evangelists of using ad tech tracking information to identify and surveil government targets.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters

Comic: The MFA Cafe

Adalytics Report Torches Ad Tech For Touting MFA Prevention While Scarfing MFA Supply

Practically every ad tech vendor has put out a press release in recent months full of bluster about cutting out made for advertising sites – and yet supply sources remain oversaturated with garbage inventory.

Cloud-Based Collaboration Is Ad Tech’s Post-Cookie Lifeline – But Will It Last?

Cross-cloud data collaboration technology is the best bet for a post-cookie solution. But it’s vulnerable to similar privacy concerns.

Topsort Raises $20 Million To Seize The Post-Cookie Market Opportunity This Year

Topsort raised $20 million, with plans to seize the 2024 opportunity for post-cookie ad tech.