Home The Big Story The Big Story: Ad Tech’s Top Talking Points

The Big Story: Ad Tech’s Top Talking Points

SHARE:
The Big Story podcast

What happens when 1,300 people in the ad ecosystem get together?

They talk about transparency, signal loss and privacy.

During AdExchanger’s Programmatic IO event in New York City on Monday and Tuesday, it became apparent that these three issues are driving the conversation in ad tech today.

For The Big Story this week, we brought together the entire editorial team to debrief on the trends.

Transparency, for example, exists on a spectrum.

Open market programmatic was once considered a rather murky place to do business despite the … “value.” But open programmatic transactions have become increasingly transparent over the years – and  now the bar is being raised even higher as DSPs like the Trade Desk expand their definition of invalid traffic to include visits that were acquired through arbitrage ad models.

And on the other end of the spectrum, connected TV lacks granular measurement that shows where ads are running, known as show-level data, a level of transparency that buyers take for granted on linear TV and with digital video.

Then we turn to signal loss. (And, yes, according to Google, third-party cookies really are going away.)

Replacing lost signals requires assembling a Swiss army knife of tools and knowing how and when to use each tool. There’s a lot the industry needs to get a handle on, from testing cookieless solutions, experimenting with contextual and collecting first-party data to learning about privacy-enhancing technologies and the Privacy Sandbox and leaning into retail media.

No wonder so many people are procrastinating.

But then there’s privacy, the raison d’être for signal loss. When the FTC’s Rashida Richardson took the stage at Prog IO, what stuck out most to our managing editor Allison Schiff was Richardson’s point that companies need to look in the mirror. As Richardson asked the crowd semi-rhetorically: “Are you comfortable with the data practices you’re currently employing?”

Subscribe

AdExchanger Daily

Get our editors’ roundup delivered to your inbox every weekday.

To get an honest answer, though, it might be best to pose that question to a company’s finance team – or, better yet, their customers – rather than people in the marketing department. Sometimes it’s hard to take off those blinders.

Must Read

How Chinese Sellers Are Quietly Reshaping US Consumer Habits

American consumers are buying more and more online products directly from Chinese manufacturers. It’s an important change, though many online shoppers are unaware.

T-Commerce Vs. Shoppable TV

Television commerce, or T-commerce, is similar to shoppable TV: both refer to buying something you see on television. But shoppable TV is far more nascent – and also has different implications on attribution.

Why White Claw’s Parent Company Is Pouring Investment Into Headless Commerce

A booze brand and a “headless commerce” platform walk into a meeting with the CFO. That might sound like the setup for a punchline, but it’s just how mar tech works these days.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters

As MMM Rides Again, Google Finds Its Place In The Conversation With Meridian

Tracking is a mess. Attribution is broken beyond repair. IP address identity data may go the way of the dodo. Which means marketing mix modeling is back, baby!

Comic: Shopper Marketing Data

The Rise Of Ecommerce Ad Metrics

As ecommerce adoption has grown, measurement has shifted away from proxies towards metrics that show business results – a move away from clicks and views towards sales and profitable growth.

Comic: Off-Platform Media

How RMNs Use MFA And Cheap Inventory To Game Attribution Rules

Retail media is built on its attribution quality, but real purchases can be gamed by programmatic metrics and create perverse incentives for RMNs to serve ads across low-quality inventory.