Home Data Privacy Roundup Simply Saying That A Solution Is ‘Privacy Safe’ Doesn’t Cut It Anymore

Simply Saying That A Solution Is ‘Privacy Safe’ Doesn’t Cut It Anymore

SHARE:
Comic: The Aduate

When I first started at AdExchanger in 2014, I was a true noob.

If I took an intro briefing call with a tech company and the person I was talking to said that their solution was “privacy safe,” I didn’t know to press any further. I accepted that “fact” at face value.

Cool, yeah, privacy safe.

But I’m (much) older, (somewhat) wiser and (definitely) more cynical now.

I’ve taken quite a few briefings with a heck of a lot of technology companies over the years, and today, when I hear someone say in passing that their solution is privacy safe, I try not to let them gloss over the point.

Yes, but how is it privacy safe?

Watch out

To be fair, talking about privacy restrictions can be a downer.

As one speaker at the IAB’s Annual Leadership Meeting in January apparently said on stage, “I’m not going to talk about privacy. Because privacy is boring; it makes our eyes glaze over.”

But if there’s one thing that can make one’s eyes pop open, it’s unwanted attention from the Federal Trade Commission or an enforcement letter from the California Privacy Protection Agency (CPPA).

Regulators are increasingly curious – and educated – about the details.

Subscribe

AdExchanger Daily

Get our editors’ roundup delivered to your inbox every weekday.

Although the CPPA’s annual budget is a rounding error for the likes of Meta and Google, its sole purpose is to protect the privacy rights of Californians. So you can expect it to be dogged in its efforts.

The FTC also just recently announced a new Office of Technology to help the agency keep pace with rapid changes and developments in the digital marketplace, including by developing new investigative techniques and advising the commission on policy and research.

Comic: The ForecastThe Hill has eyes

In other words, surveillance can be a two-way street.

Regulators are making it their business to poke around the inner workings of data-driven online advertising.

Take Kochava. It’s in the midst of legal wrangling with the FTC over allegedly facilitating the sale of sensitive location information. Kochava argues that the FTC’s case doesn’t have legs, in part because it believes that the commission’s accusations are overly broad and don’t point to a specific law or regulation that prohibits its business practices. The case is proceeding after a judge in Idaho denied Kochava’s motion to dismiss last month.

Be that as it may and regardless of the outcome, ad tech is under the microscope.

And there’s no doubt that enforcers will continue to make inquiries and ask questions. Questions like, “How, exactly, is your solution ‘privacy safe’?”

Be worthy of trust

But that’s a question companies should be able to answer in multiple contexts.

Regulators will want to get into the weeds, but regular people deserve a consumer-friendly (human-friendly?) explanation of how and why their data is being collected.

Simply saying, “Don’t worry, you can trust us, we do things in a privacy-safe way” won’t cut it, regardless of who’s being addressed.

Sharing enough detail without being overwhelming is a difficult balance to strike, and there’s no perfect answer. But one thing is for certain: Privacy platitudes are for hacks or for those with something to hide.

Agree? Disagree? All opinions are welcome. Let me know what you think. Drop me a line at [email protected].

Must Read

Comic: Off-Platform Media

How RMNs Use MFA And Cheap Inventory To Game Attribution Rules

Retail media is built on its attribution quality, but real purchases can be gamed by programmatic metrics and create perverse incentives for RMNs to serve ads across low-quality inventory.

There’s A Lot Wrong With Google’s And Meta’s Non-Transparent ‘Refund’ Practices

Google and Meta are playing with fire. Their opaque refund practices have already exposed them to customer blowback – and could lead to class-action lawsuits by disgruntled advertisers.

Comic: The Great Online Privacy Battle

How US Intelligence Agencies Buy And Use Programmatic Data For Surveillance

Mike Yeagley, an independent contractor who has scouted and acquired commercial data and technology on behalf of intelligence agencies, is one of the earliest evangelists of using ad tech tracking information to identify and surveil government targets.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters

Comic: The MFA Cafe

Adalytics Report Torches Ad Tech For Touting MFA Prevention While Scarfing MFA Supply

Practically every ad tech vendor has put out a press release in recent months full of bluster about cutting out made for advertising sites – and yet supply sources remain oversaturated with garbage inventory.

Cloud-Based Collaboration Is Ad Tech’s Post-Cookie Lifeline – But Will It Last?

Cross-cloud data collaboration technology is the best bet for a post-cookie solution. But it’s vulnerable to similar privacy concerns.

Topsort Raises $20 Million To Seize The Post-Cookie Market Opportunity This Year

Topsort raised $20 million, with plans to seize the 2024 opportunity for post-cookie ad tech.